Urban Cruiser GL vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
200 km/h
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
/
4365
4760 mm
1795
1930 mm
1645
1927 mm
2600
2750 mm
210
224 m
/
5 Doors
/
400 L
Fuel Economy
19.8
10 Km/L
45 L
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
7
/
✓
/
Fabric
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Rear
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
Driver And Front Passenger + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
12.3
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
4
9
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
6 Speed Automatic Transmission
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
2.0 L
101 - 101
223 BHP - 342 BHP
6 Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
101 BHP
224 BHP
135
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Urban Cruiser GL
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- ABS
300 Challenger 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish exterior design meets the taste of youth
- Economical fuel consumption suitable for daily commuting
- Reliable service network and rich security features
Negative
- The engine performance is average, especially at high speeds
- Limited back row space for large families
- The entertainment and control system is simple compared to competitors
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Urban Cruiser GL if you care more about price; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Urban Cruiser GL has a fuel consumption of 5.05, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Urban Cruiser GL is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Urban Cruiser GL has a wheelbase of 2600, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 300 Challenger 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Urban Cruiser GL uses Front Wheel Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.