Urban Cruiser GL vs X55 II Fashion Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
17
18
4365
4620
1795
1886
1645
1680
2600
2735
210
160
/
1550
/
5
Fuel Economy
19.8
/
45 L
53
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
7
10.25
✓
✓
Fabric
Fabric
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Rear
/
/
✓
/
LCD
/
Front Row Seats
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Driver And Front Passenger + Side + Curtain
Driver and passenger air bags
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
10.1
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
4
4
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
6 Speed Automatic Transmission
7DCT
/
7DCT
/
7
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
Macpherson independent suspension
/
multi-link independent suspension
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
225/60 R18
215/60 R17
225/60 R18
/
✓
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
101 - 101
138 - 185 BHP
6 Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
7-speed Dual-Clutch Transmission & 7DCT
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
101 BHP
185 BHP
135
275
/
1.5TD
/
138
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
ECO/Sport/Comfort/Smart
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Urban Cruiser GL
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- ABS
X55 II Fashion
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Cool Box
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish exterior design meets the taste of youth
- Economical fuel consumption suitable for daily commuting
- Reliable service network and rich security features
Negative
- The engine performance is average, especially at high speeds
- Limited back row space for large families
- The entertainment and control system is simple compared to competitors
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Urban Cruiser GL if you care more about overall equipment; choose X55 II Fashion if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Urban Cruiser GL has a fuel consumption of 5.05, while X55 II Fashion has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Urban Cruiser GL has a wheelbase of 2600, while X55 II Fashion has a wheelbase of 2735. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X55 II Fashion, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Urban Cruiser GL uses Front Wheel Drive, while X55 II Fashion uses Front Drive.