Urban Cruiser GL X vs 2008 GT Comparison

Car Information

/

8.2

Engine / Motor

4

3

/

/

Dimensions

5

5

17

17

4365

4300

1795

1987

1645

1550

2600

/

210

/

/

545

Fuel Economy

19.8

16.8

45

44

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

7

/

/

Leather

/

/

/

/

Rear

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

Driver And Front Passenger + Side + Curtain

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

9

10

6

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

6 Speed Automatic Transmission

AT

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Front Drive

Wheels/brakes

215/60 R17

/

215/60 R17

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 1.5 L

0.0 L - 1199 L

101 - 101

110 BHP - 155 BHP

6 Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic

AT & Automatic

Gasoline

Diesel & Electric & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5

1.2

Gasoline

Gasoline

101

130

135

230

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Urban Cruiser GL X

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Front Cross Traffic Alert
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Number of Airbags
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
  • 2008 GT

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • First Aid Kit
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Stylish exterior design meets the taste of youth
  • Economical fuel consumption suitable for daily commuting
  • Reliable service network and rich security features

Negative

  • The engine performance is average, especially at high speeds
  • Limited back row space for large families
  • The entertainment and control system is simple compared to competitors

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickUrban Cruiser GL X

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Urban Cruiser GL X if you care more about price; choose 2008 GT if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Urban Cruiser GL X

VS

BYD | Atto 3 Premium

Toyota | Urban Cruiser GL X

VS

Toyota | Corolla Cross 1.8L XL (HEV)

Toyota | Urban Cruiser GL X

VS

Honda | HRV 1.5L i-VTEC DX

Toyota | Urban Cruiser GL X

VS

Chery | Tiggo8 Pro Max COM

Toyota | Urban Cruiser GL X

VS

BYD | Atto 3 Comfort

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Urban Cruiser GL X has a fuel consumption of 5.05, while 2008 GT has a fuel consumption of 5.95. Therefore, Urban Cruiser GL X is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Urban Cruiser GL X has a wheelbase of 2600, while 2008 GT has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Urban Cruiser GL X uses Front Drive, while 2008 GT uses Front Drive.