Urban Cruiser GL X vs HS 2.0T 9AT DEL 2WD Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
210
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
17
/
4365
4630
1795
1890
1645
1663
2600
2750
210
/
/
507
Fuel Economy
19.8
13.5
45
65
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
7
/
✓
/
Leather
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Rear
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
Driver And Front Passenger + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
6 Speed Automatic Transmission
9AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
/
/
✓
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
101 - 101
127 - 231
6 Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic
9AT & Automatic & DCT
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
2.0
Gasoline
Gasoline
101
231
135
370
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Urban Cruiser GL X
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Steering Adjustment
- Front Cross Traffic Alert
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- ABS
HS 2.0T 9AT DEL 2WD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish exterior design meets the taste of youth
- Economical fuel consumption suitable for daily commuting
- Reliable service network and rich security features
Negative
- The engine performance is average, especially at high speeds
- Limited back row space for large families
- The entertainment and control system is simple compared to competitors
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickUrban Cruiser GL X
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Urban Cruiser GL X if you care more about price; choose HS 2.0T 9AT DEL 2WD if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Urban Cruiser GL X has a fuel consumption of 5.05, while HS 2.0T 9AT DEL 2WD has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, Urban Cruiser GL X is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Urban Cruiser GL X has a wheelbase of 2600, while HS 2.0T 9AT DEL 2WD has a wheelbase of 2750. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, HS 2.0T 9AT DEL 2WD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Urban Cruiser GL X uses Front Drive, while HS 2.0T 9AT DEL 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive.