Urban Cruiser GL X vs T2 i-DM Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

4

4

/

200

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5

5

17

/

4365

4785

1795

2006

1645

1875

2600

2800

210

220

/

5

/

752

Fuel Economy

19.8

18.5

45

70 L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

Interior

7

/

/

Leather

Leather

/

/

/

/

Rear

/

/

/

/

/

/

Digital

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

Driver And Front Passenger + Side + Curtain

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

9

15.6

/

/

6

12

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

Transmission

/

6 Speed Automatic Transmission

DHT

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

215/60 R17

/

215/60 R17

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 1.5 L

1.5

101 - 101

154 BHP - 600

6 Speed Automatic Transmission & Automatic

3DHT & DHT

Gasoline

Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5

1.5

Gasoline

Hybrid

101

154 BHP

135

220

/

In-Line

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Urban Cruiser GL X

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Front Cross Traffic Alert
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Number of Airbags
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
  • T2 i-DM

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Stylish exterior design meets the taste of youth
  • Economical fuel consumption suitable for daily commuting
  • Reliable service network and rich security features

Negative

  • The engine performance is average, especially at high speeds
  • Limited back row space for large families
  • The entertainment and control system is simple compared to competitors

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickT2 i-DM

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Urban Cruiser GL X if you care more about fuel economy; choose T2 i-DM if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Toyota | Urban Cruiser GL X

VS

BYD | Atto 3 Premium

Toyota | Urban Cruiser GL X

VS

Toyota | Corolla Cross 1.8L XL (HEV)

Toyota | Urban Cruiser GL X

VS

Honda | HRV 1.5L i-VTEC DX

Toyota | Urban Cruiser GL X

VS

Chery | Tiggo8 Pro Max COM

Toyota | Urban Cruiser GL X

VS

BYD | Atto 3 Comfort

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Urban Cruiser GL X has a fuel consumption of 5.05, while T2 i-DM has a fuel consumption of 5.41. Therefore, Urban Cruiser GL X is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Urban Cruiser GL X has a wheelbase of 2600, while T2 i-DM has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, T2 i-DM, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Urban Cruiser GL X uses Front Drive, while T2 i-DM uses Four Wheel Drive.