Urus SE 4.0T V8 Hybrid vs XM 2025 V8 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
312 km/h
/
8
8
3996 cc
/
Dimensions
4 Seater
5
5 Doors
/
5123 mm
5110
2022 mm
2210
1638 mm
1755
3003 mm
3105
617 L
/
172 m
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
/
75 L
69
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
4-Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
✓
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
/
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
4.0 L
4.4 L - 4.4 L
650 BHP - 800 BHP
653 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
4 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
V
/
4.0 L
4.4
Hybrid
Hybrid
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
800 BHP
653 BHP
800 Nm
800
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Urus SE 4.0T V8 Hybrid
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
XM 2025 V8
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Cool box
- Rear AC Controls
- Electric Curtain - Rear
- Temperature Display
- Rear Camera
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Front Crumple Zone
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Front and Rear Crumple Zone
- Rollover stability control
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Tire Repair Kit
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- First Aid Kit
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Crosswind Assist
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Speed Limiter
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- Outstanding sports performance with a powerful engine.
- Unique and eye catching exterior design.
- A luxurious interior with advanced technological equipment.
Negative
- The cost of purchase and maintenance is high.
- High fuel consumption and poor environmental considerations.
- Limited comfort while driving long distances.
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Urus SE 4.0T V8 Hybrid if you care more about overall equipment; choose XM 2025 V8 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Urus SE 4.0T V8 Hybrid has a fuel consumption of 10, while XM 2025 V8 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Urus SE 4.0T V8 Hybrid has a wheelbase of 3003 mm, while XM 2025 V8 has a wheelbase of 3105. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, XM 2025 V8, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Urus SE 4.0T V8 Hybrid uses All Wheel Drive, while XM 2025 V8 uses No data.