Urus SE 4.0T V8 Hybrid vs Range Rover SE P360 3.0L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
312 km/h
/
8
/
3996 cc
/
Dimensions
4 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
5123 mm
/
2022 mm
/
1638 mm
/
3003 mm
/
617 L
/
172 m
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
8.5
75 L
/
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
4-Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
/
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
/
Key Spec
4.0 L
3.0 L - 5.0 L
650 BHP - 800 BHP
360 BHP - 525 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
4 Seater
4 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
V
/
4.0 L
3.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
800 BHP
360 BHP
800 Nm
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Urus SE 4.0T V8 Hybrid
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Headlight On Reminder
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Range Rover SE P360 3.0L
Review Comparison
Positive
- Outstanding sports performance with a powerful engine.
- Unique and eye catching exterior design.
- A luxurious interior with advanced technological equipment.
Negative
- The cost of purchase and maintenance is high.
- High fuel consumption and poor environmental considerations.
- Limited comfort while driving long distances.
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRange Rover SE P360 3.0L
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Urus SE 4.0T V8 Hybrid if you care more about fuel economy; choose Range Rover SE P360 3.0L if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Urus SE 4.0T V8 Hybrid has a fuel consumption of 10, while Range Rover SE P360 3.0L has a fuel consumption of 11.76. Therefore, Urus SE 4.0T V8 Hybrid is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Urus SE 4.0T V8 Hybrid has a wheelbase of 3003 mm, while Range Rover SE P360 3.0L has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Urus SE 4.0T V8 Hybrid uses All Wheel Drive, while Range Rover SE P360 3.0L uses No data.