VF9 2025 Eco vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
161 km/h
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
20
16
5119
4341 mm
2004
1804 mm
1691
1693 mm
3148
2676 mm
212
414 L
Fuel Economy
75
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
Front & Back Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
11
Front Driver And Passenger Airbags.Passenger Airbag With Disconnecting Function.
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
15.6
/
✓
✓
6
/
/
✓
Transmission
DHT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Independent, Double Wishbone
/
Multi-link with Air Spring
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
TBD
/
402 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
DHT
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
7
5 - 5
/
1.6 L - 2.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
1.6 L
Electric
Gasoline
402 BHP
115 BHP
620
156 Nm
Motor
Dual Motor
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Eco / Normal / Sport
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
VF9 2025 Eco
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Lane Departure Warning
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025
- Number of Airbags
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose VF9 2025 Eco if you care more about price; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, VF9 2025 Eco has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, VF9 2025 Eco has a wheelbase of 3148, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, VF9 2025 Eco, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. VF9 2025 Eco uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 uses Front Wheel Drive.