View C Panel Van vs Q7 45 TFSI S-Line Quattro (252 HP) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
120 km/h
233 km/h
Dimensions
2 Seater
5 Seater
5020 mm
5063 mm
1690 mm
1970 mm
1935 mm
1741 mm
2590 mm
2994 mm
/
740 L
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
12.3 Km/L
10 Km/L
12.3 Km/L
/
85 L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Engine
2.2 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
76 BHP
252 BHP
193 Nm
370 Nm
Key Spec
/
2.0 L - 3.0 L
/
252 BHP - 340 BHP
/
Automatic & CVT
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater - 6 Seater
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
View C Panel Van
Q7 45 TFSI S-Line Quattro (252 HP)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickQ7 45 TFSI S-Line Quattro (252 HP)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose View C Panel Van if you care more about overall equipment; choose Q7 45 TFSI S-Line Quattro (252 HP) if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, View C Panel Van has a fuel consumption of 10, while Q7 45 TFSI S-Line Quattro (252 HP) has a fuel consumption of 8.13. Therefore, Q7 45 TFSI S-Line Quattro (252 HP) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, View C Panel Van has a wheelbase of 2590 mm, while Q7 45 TFSI S-Line Quattro (252 HP) has a wheelbase of 2994 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Q7 45 TFSI S-Line Quattro (252 HP), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. View C Panel Van uses Rear Wheel Drive, while Q7 45 TFSI S-Line Quattro (252 HP) uses All Wheel Drive.