Volkswagen CC 2017 1.8 S vs 06 Hybrid Pro Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
223
/
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4802
4855
1855
1960
1417
1450
2711
/
532
/
Fuel Economy
13.9
18.6
70
/
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
/
255/45 R20
/
255/45 R20
Key Spec
1.8 L - 3.6 L
-
160 BHP - 300 BHP
314 BHP - 343 BHP
Automatic & Manual
DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.8 L
1.5
Gasoline
Hybrid
160 BHP
314 BHP
250
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Volkswagen CC 2017 1.8 S
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- First Aid Kit
- Spare Wheel
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
06 Hybrid Pro
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Pick06 Hybrid Pro
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Volkswagen CC 2017 1.8 S if you care more about overall equipment; choose 06 Hybrid Pro if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Volkswagen CC 2017 1.8 S has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while 06 Hybrid Pro has a fuel consumption of 5.38. Therefore, 06 Hybrid Pro is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Volkswagen CC 2017 1.8 S has a wheelbase of 2711, while 06 Hybrid Pro has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Volkswagen CC 2017 1.8 S uses Front Wheel Drive, while 06 Hybrid Pro uses No data.