Volkswagen Phaeton 2013 V6 vs Mazda 3 Sedan 2.0L Evolve Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

239

/

6

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

5059

/

1903

/

1450

/

2881

/

500

/

Fuel Economy

8.2

18.2

90

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

All Wheel Drive

/

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

3.2 L - 6.0 L

2.0 L - 2.0 L

241 BHP - 450 BHP

153 BHP - 153 BHP

Automatic

6 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH SPORTS MODE & Automatic

Gasoline

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.2 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

241 BHP

153 BHP

315

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Volkswagen Phaeton 2013 V6

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear AC Controls
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
  • Mazda 3 Sedan 2.0L Evolve

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickVolkswagen Phaeton 2013 V6

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Volkswagen Phaeton 2013 V6 if you care more about price; choose Mazda 3 Sedan 2.0L Evolve if you care more about fuel economy.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Volkswagen | Volkswagen Phaeton 2013 V6

    VS

    Hongqi | H7 2.0T Comfortable

    Volkswagen | Volkswagen Phaeton 2013 V6

    VS

    Hongqi | H7 3.0T Flagship

    Volkswagen | Volkswagen Phaeton 2013 V6

    VS

    Hongqi | L5 6.0 V12

    Volkswagen | Volkswagen Phaeton 2013 V6

    VS

    Hongqi | EQM5 T3 Edition

    Volkswagen | Volkswagen Phaeton 2013 V6

    VS

    Volkswagen | Jetta 2.0 S

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Volkswagen Phaeton 2013 V6 has a fuel consumption of 12.2, while Mazda 3 Sedan 2.0L Evolve has a fuel consumption of 5.49. Therefore, Mazda 3 Sedan 2.0L Evolve is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Volkswagen Phaeton 2013 V6 has a wheelbase of 2881, while Mazda 3 Sedan 2.0L Evolve has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Volkswagen Phaeton 2013 V6 uses All Wheel Drive, while Mazda 3 Sedan 2.0L Evolve uses No data.