Volkswagen Phaeton 2016 V6 vs Mage E1 Comparison
Car Information
/
SUV/
8.1
Engine / Motor
250
190
6
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
5059
4650
1903
1905
1450
1630
2881
2775
500
/
/
1480
/
19
Fuel Economy
8.8
15.8
90
51
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
13.2
/
6
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
/
235/55 R19
/
235/55 R19
Key Spec
3.2 L - 6.0 L
1.5
241 BHP - 450 BHP
202 BHP
Automatic
7AT & AT
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.2 L
1.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
280 BHP
202 BHP
370
305
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Volkswagen Phaeton 2016 V6
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Rear Defogger
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Steering Adjustment
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Mage E1
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMage E1
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Volkswagen Phaeton 2016 V6 if you care more about interior space; choose Mage E1 if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Volkswagen Phaeton 2016 V6 has a fuel consumption of 11.36, while Mage E1 has a fuel consumption of 6.33. Therefore, Mage E1 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Volkswagen Phaeton 2016 V6 has a wheelbase of 2881, while Mage E1 has a wheelbase of 2775. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Volkswagen Phaeton 2016 V6, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Volkswagen Phaeton 2016 V6 uses All Wheel Drive, while Mage E1 uses Front Drive.