Volkswagen Phaeton 2016 V6 vs Suzuki Baleno 2020 1.4L GLX Comparison
Engine / Motor
250
170
6
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5059
3995
1903
1745
1450
1470
2881
2520
500
355
Fuel Economy
8.8
22.7
90
37
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
3.2 L - 6.0 L
1.4 L - 1373 L
241 BHP - 450 BHP
91 BHP - 103 BHP
Automatic
4AT & Automatic
Gasoline
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.2 L
1.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
280 BHP
91 BHP
370
130
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Volkswagen Phaeton 2016 V6
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Rear Defogger
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Steering Adjustment
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Suzuki Baleno 2020 1.4L GLX
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption
- A budget-friendly price
- Stylish exterior design
Negative
- Power performance on highways is limited
- The quality of interior materials is modest
- Sound insulation can be improved
Related comparisons
Editor's PickSuzuki Baleno 2020 1.4L GLX
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Volkswagen Phaeton 2016 V6 if you care more about interior space; choose Suzuki Baleno 2020 1.4L GLX if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Volkswagen Phaeton 2016 V6 has a fuel consumption of 11.36, while Suzuki Baleno 2020 1.4L GLX has a fuel consumption of 4.41. Therefore, Suzuki Baleno 2020 1.4L GLX is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Volkswagen Phaeton 2016 V6 has a wheelbase of 2881, while Suzuki Baleno 2020 1.4L GLX has a wheelbase of 2520. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Volkswagen Phaeton 2016 V6, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Volkswagen Phaeton 2016 V6 uses All Wheel Drive, while Suzuki Baleno 2020 1.4L GLX uses Front Wheel Drive.