Volvo C70 2012 T5 vs C 63 AMG Comparison
Engine / Motor
235
/
5
/
Dimensions
4 Seater
/
4615
/
1836
/
1400
/
2640
/
404
/
Fuel Economy
14.9
/
62
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.5 L
/
Gasoline
/
230 BHP
/
320
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
/
TBD
/
TBD
/
TBD
/
TBD
/
TBD
/
TBD
Comparison of configuration highlights
Volvo C70 2012 T5
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Seats - Comfort
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Rollover stability control
- First Aid Kit
- Blind Spot Warning
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
C 63 AMG
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickC 63 AMG
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Volvo C70 2012 T5 if you care more about overall equipment; choose C 63 AMG if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Volvo C70 2012 T5 has a fuel consumption of 6.71, while C 63 AMG has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Volvo C70 2012 T5 has a wheelbase of 2640, while C 63 AMG has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Volvo C70 2012 T5 uses Front Wheel Drive, while C 63 AMG uses No data.