EX30 Core vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
161 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4233
4341 mm
1837
1804 mm
1549
1693 mm
2650
2676 mm
234
414 L
Fuel Economy
/
17.2 Km/L
/
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
344
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
dht
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
TBD
/
272 BHP - 428 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
dht & DHT
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Electric
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
/
5 - 5
5 - 5
/
1.6 L - 2.0 L
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
/
1.6 L
Electric
Gasoline
272 BHP
115 BHP
343
156 Nm
Motor
Single
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
EX30 Core
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEX30 Core
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EX30 Core if you care more about price; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EX30 Core has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EX30 Core has a wheelbase of 2650, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EX30 Core uses Rear Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.