EX30 Core vs EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
N/A, Electric
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
4233
5209
1837
2010
1549
1731
2650
3110
234
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
344
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Transmission
dht
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
TBD
TBD
272 BHP - 428 BHP
429 BHP
dht & DHT
Automatic
Electric
Electric
TBD
320 km
5 - 5
6 - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
0.0 L
Electric
Electric
272 BHP
429 BHP
343
600
Motor
Single
/
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EX30 Core
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEX30 Core
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EX30 Core if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EX30 Core has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EX30 Core has a wheelbase of 2650, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EX30 Core uses Rear Drive, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters uses All Wheel Drive.