CarteaCompare CarsEX30 Core vs MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST

EX30 Core vs MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST Comparison

Car Information

5.7

8.0

/

Engine / Motor

/

185

/

3

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

4233

4.314

1837

1.809

1549

1.624

2650

2.585

234

448

Fuel Economy

/

17.2

/

48

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

344

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

dht

CVT

/

Chassis & Steering

Rear Drive

Front Wheel Drive

/

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

TBD

/

272 BHP - 428 BHP

112 BHP - 168

dht & DHT

6AT & Automatic & CVT

Electric

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

/

5 - 5

5 Seater

/

1.3 L - 1.5 L

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

/

1.3 L

Electric

Petrol

272 BHP

160 BHP

343

230

Motor

Single

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • EX30 Core

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Number of Airbags
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
  • MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Active Bonnet
    • Collision Detection
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Modern and attractive exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Competitive price compared to specifications

Negative

  • Average interior material quality
  • Engine performance is limited by power
  • The lack of some advanced security systems

Related comparisons

Editor's PickEX30 Core

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose EX30 Core if you care more about price; choose MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Volvo | EX30 Core

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Volvo | EX30 Core

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Volvo | EX30 Core

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Volvo | EX30 Core

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Volvo | EX30 Core

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, EX30 Core has a fuel consumption of No data, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, EX30 Core has a wheelbase of 2650, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST has a wheelbase of 2.585. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EX30 Core, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EX30 Core uses Rear Drive, while MG ZS 2020 1.3T ZST uses Front Wheel Drive.