EX30 Core vs SQ6 e-tron Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5
4233
/
1837
/
1549
/
2650
/
234
514
/
64
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
344
/
/
11.9
/
Dinamica Microfibre
/
✓
/
Sport Seats Plus
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
14.5
Battery/Charging
/
270
/
11
/
10 min
Transmission
dht
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
对
Key Spec
TBD
TBD
272 BHP - 428 BHP
TBD
dht & DHT
DHT
Electric
Electric
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
/
Electric
Electric
272 BHP
/
343
/
Motor
Single
/
/
Lithium-ion
/
489
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
EX30 Core
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
SQ6 e-tron
- 360 Degree Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEX30 Core
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose EX30 Core if you care more about price; choose SQ6 e-tron if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, EX30 Core has a fuel consumption of No data, while SQ6 e-tron has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, EX30 Core has a wheelbase of 2650, while SQ6 e-tron has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. EX30 Core uses Rear Drive, while SQ6 e-tron uses Four-Wheel Drive.