CarteaCompare CarsVolvo S40 2012 2.0L vs Alsvin 1.5L Advanced

Volvo S40 2012 2.0L vs Alsvin 1.5L Advanced Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

215

/

4

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

4476

4390 mm

1770

1725 mm

1454

1468 mm

2460

2535 mm

404

500 L

Fuel Economy

17.5

13 Km/L

55

45 L

/

13 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Manual

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

2.0 L

1.5 L - 1.5 L

145 BHP

105 BHP - 105 BHP

Manual

Automatic & DCT

Gasoline

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

1.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

145 BHP

105 BHP

185

145 Nm

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Volvo S40 2012 2.0L

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Rear Defogger
    • Keyless Entry
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
  • Alsvin 1.5L Advanced

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Competitive price compared to competitors
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Advanced technical features for its class

Negative

  • Limited internal space
  • Material quality can be improved
  • Engine performance is limited on highways

Related comparisons

Editor's PickVolvo S40 2012 2.0L

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Volvo S40 2012 2.0L if you care more about price; choose Alsvin 1.5L Advanced if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Volvo | Volvo S40 2012 2.0L

VS

Hongqi | H7 2.0T Comfortable

Volvo | Volvo S40 2012 2.0L

VS

Hongqi | H7 3.0T Flagship

Volvo | Volvo S40 2012 2.0L

VS

Hongqi | L5 6.0 V12

Volvo | Volvo S40 2012 2.0L

VS

Hongqi | EQM5 T3 Edition

Volvo | Volvo S40 2012 2.0L

VS

Volkswagen | Jetta 2.0 S

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Volvo S40 2012 2.0L has a fuel consumption of 5.71, while Alsvin 1.5L Advanced has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, Volvo S40 2012 2.0L is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Volvo S40 2012 2.0L has a wheelbase of 2460, while Alsvin 1.5L Advanced has a wheelbase of 2535 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Alsvin 1.5L Advanced, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Volvo S40 2012 2.0L uses Front Wheel Drive, while Alsvin 1.5L Advanced uses Front Wheel Drive.