Wagoneer S vs ES5 2025 425 Pro Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
170
Dimensions
5
5
/
1615
/
4476
/
1849
/
1621
/
2050
/
462-1423
/
4.99
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
Interior
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
15.6
/
✓
/
4
Battery/Charging
/
0.43h
/
8.5h
Transmission
DHT
DHT
Chassis & Steering
/
Rear Drive
/
MacPherson Strut
/
Multi-link Independent Suspension
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
225/55 R17
/
225/55 R17
Key Spec
TBD
TBD
600 BHP
170 BHP
DHT
DHT
Electric
Electric
TBD
TBD
5
5
Engine
Electric
Electric
600 BHP
170 BHP
/
/
/
✓
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
250
/
1
/
6.6kW
/
Lithium Iron Phosphate
/
Permanent-magnet Synchronous Motor
/
Rear
Technologies
/
Rear
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport, Snow, Individual, Comfort, ECO
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Wagoneer S
ES5 2025 425 Pro
- Keyless Entry
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickES5 2025 425 Pro
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Wagoneer S if you care more about power; choose ES5 2025 425 Pro if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Wagoneer S has a fuel consumption of No data, while ES5 2025 425 Pro has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Wagoneer S has a wheelbase of No data, while ES5 2025 425 Pro has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Wagoneer S uses No data, while ES5 2025 425 Pro uses Rear Drive.