Wingle 5 PETROL 4X2 vs Rich 2.4L DC (4x4) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
160 km/h
Dimensions
2
5 Seater
1480
/
5035
5080 mm
1720
1820 mm
1690
1715 mm
3050
3050 mm
178
/
/
830 L
Fuel Economy
/
12.2 Km/L
/
60 L
/
12.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
5 Speed Manual Transmission
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
All Wheel Drive
Double cross-arms type, independent suspension With torsion bar springs
/
Rigid leaf springs
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
235/70R16
/
235/70R16
/
Exterior
كهربائي
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
2.4L
2.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
125 HP
217 BHP
200
136 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Key Spec
/
2.4 L
/
217 BHP
/
Manual
/
Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Comparison of configuration highlights
Wingle 5 PETROL 4X2
- Parking sensor rear
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
Rich 2.4L DC (4x4)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickRich 2.4L DC (4x4)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Wingle 5 PETROL 4X2 if you care more about overall equipment; choose Rich 2.4L DC (4x4) if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Wingle 5 PETROL 4X2 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Rich 2.4L DC (4x4) has a fuel consumption of 8.2. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Wingle 5 PETROL 4X2 has a wheelbase of 3050, while Rich 2.4L DC (4x4) has a wheelbase of 3050 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Wingle 5 PETROL 4X2 uses Rear Drive, while Rich 2.4L DC (4x4) uses All Wheel Drive.