Wrangler Sahara 2.0T vs EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
N/A, Electric
1998 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4 Doors
/
4785 mm
5209
1877 mm
2010
1869 mm
1731
3007 mm
3110
487 L
/
254 m
/
Fuel Economy
7 Km/L
/
87 L
/
7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.6 L
/
270 BHP - 285 BHP
429 BHP - 543 BHP
Automatic & Manual
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
4 Seater - 5 Seater
6 - 7 Seater
/
TBD
/
320 km
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Halogen
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
0.0 L
Gasoline
Electric
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
270 BHP
429 BHP
400 Nm
600
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Wrangler Sahara 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Wrangler Sahara 2.0T if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Wrangler Sahara 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 14.29, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Wrangler Sahara 2.0T has a wheelbase of 3007 mm, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Wrangler Sahara 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters uses All Wheel Drive.