Wrangler Sahara 2.0T vs Land Cruiser GXR3 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
6
1998 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7
4 Doors
/
4785 mm
5115
1877 mm
1980
1869 mm
1945
3007 mm
/
487 L
/
254 m
/
/
20
Fuel Economy
7 Km/L
10.1
87 L
110
7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
All Doors
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
Hi Fabric
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
Passenger Door
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front + Knee + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12
12.3
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
6
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Central And Rear
/
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
Full Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
Wheels/brakes
/
265/55 R20
/
265/55 R20
Key Spec
2.0 L - 6.4 L
3.3 L - 5.7 L
270 BHP - 470
240 BHP - 409
8AT & Automatic & Manual
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 - 5 Seater
7 - 8 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Halogen
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
V
2.0 L
3.5
Gasoline
Gasoline
Twin Turbo
/
4
/
270 BHP
409
400 Nm
650
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Wrangler Sahara 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Land Cruiser GXR3
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Cool Box
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Wrangler Sahara 2.0T if you care more about price; choose Land Cruiser GXR3 if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Wrangler Sahara 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 14.29, while Land Cruiser GXR3 has a fuel consumption of 9.9. Therefore, Land Cruiser GXR3 is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Wrangler Sahara 2.0T has a wheelbase of 3007 mm, while Land Cruiser GXR3 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Wrangler Sahara 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive, while Land Cruiser GXR3 uses Four-Wheel Drive.