Wrangler Sahara 2.0T vs Santa Fe SE Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
220 km/h
4
4
1998 cc
2490 cc
GCC
American
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4 Doors
5 Doors
4785 mm
4785 mm
1877 mm
1900 mm
1869 mm
1602 mm
3007 mm
2765 mm
487 L
options. L
254 m
/
Fuel Economy
7 Km/L
/
87 L
70 L
7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Smart Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Vinyl Upholstery
Digital
Digital
Single
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12
10.25
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
8
8
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3605 L
1.6 L - 3.5 L
270 BHP - 285 BHP
176 BHP - 280 BHP
Automatic
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
4 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Halogen
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
Twin Turbo
Single Turbo
4
4
270 BHP
277 BHP
400 Nm
311 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Wrangler Sahara 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Santa Fe SE
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Wrangler Sahara 2.0T if you care more about interior space; choose Santa Fe SE if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Wrangler Sahara 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 14.29, while Santa Fe SE has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Wrangler Sahara 2.0T has a wheelbase of 3007 mm, while Santa Fe SE has a wheelbase of 2765 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Wrangler Sahara 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Wrangler Sahara 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive, while Santa Fe SE uses Front Wheel Drive.