Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T vs Captiva LS Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

/

6

/

3600 cc

/

GCC

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

4 Doors

/

4785 mm

/

1877 mm

/

1801 mm

/

3007 mm

/

487 L

1051L

246 m

/

/

18

Fuel Economy

7 Km/L

/

87 L

/

7 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

Smart Key

Manual

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Single

/

/

/

/

Manual

/

/

/

Standard

/

/

/

3.5

/

/

diagonal display

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

2 Front and sides

/

Infotainment

12

10.4

/

/

/

Android LCD

9

4

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

CVT

Chassis & Steering

Four Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

/

Mcpherson

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

2.0 L - 3605 L

1.5 L - 3200 L

270 BHP - 285 BHP

144 BHP - 223 BHP

Automatic

Automatic & CVT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

4 Seater - 5 Seater

5 Seater - 7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

Halogen

HALOGEN

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

V

/

3.6 L

1.5 T

Gasoline

Gasoline

4

/

285 BHP

144 BHP

352 Nm

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Manual

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • Captiva LS

    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickCaptiva LS

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T if you care more about power; choose Captiva LS if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Jeep | Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T

VS

Ford | Expedition Active 4X2 2025

Jeep | Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T

VS

Toyota | Land Cruiser Prado 2.8T TXL-2 Diesel

Jeep | Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2023 Limited 5.7L

Jeep | Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T

VS

Tank | 500 Rock Edition Elite

Jeep | Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T

VS

Tank | 500 Rock Edition Elite

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T has a fuel consumption of 14.29, while Captiva LS has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T has a wheelbase of 3007 mm, while Captiva LS has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Wrangler Sport 3.6L M/T uses Four Wheel Drive, while Captiva LS uses Front Wheel Drive.