X-TRAIL N-TREK (4WD) vs RX Comfort 2.0T Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
185 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
18
/
4
5 Doors
4680
4781 mm
2065
1920 mm
1730
1671 mm
2705
2815 mm
212
187 m
/
500 L
Fuel Economy
15.4
16 Km/L
55
50 L
/
16 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Driver Seat
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
TFT
/
Passenger Seat
/
Fabric/Leather
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
Driver + Passenger + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
12.3
✓
/
✓
Android LCD
10
8
BOSE
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
✓
/
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Independent strut
/
Multi Link
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
Key Spec
2.5 L
2.0 L
132 BHP - 188 BHP
261 BHP
Automatic & CVT & Xtronic CVT
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder
/
181 BHP
261 BHP
181 @ 6,000
/
244
400 Nm
244 @ 4,000
/
/
In-Line
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
AUTO-ECO-SPORT-SNOW-OFF ROAD
✓
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
X-TRAIL N-TREK (4WD)
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Rear Camera
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
RX Comfort 2.0T
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X-TRAIL N-TREK (4WD) if you care more about overall equipment; choose RX Comfort 2.0T if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X-TRAIL N-TREK (4WD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while RX Comfort 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 6.25. Therefore, RX Comfort 2.0T is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X-TRAIL N-TREK (4WD) has a wheelbase of 2705, while RX Comfort 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2815 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, RX Comfort 2.0T, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X-TRAIL N-TREK (4WD) uses Four-Wheel Drive, while RX Comfort 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive.