X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats vs EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
N/A, Electric
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
17
/
4
/
4680
5209
2065
2010
1730
1731
2705
3110
212
/
Fuel Economy
16.1
/
55
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
TFT
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver + Passenger + Side + Curtain
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
✓
/
Xtronic CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
Independent strut
/
Multi Link
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
/
✓
Key Spec
2.5 L
/
132 BHP - 188 BHP
429 BHP - 543 BHP
Automatic & CVT & Xtronic CVT
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater - 7 Seater
4 Seater - 7 Seater
/
TBD
/
320 km - 515 km
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
0.0 L
Gasoline
Electric
DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder
/
181 BHP
429 BHP
181 @ 6,000
/
244
600
244 @ 4,000
/
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
AUTO-ECO-SPORT
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Door Edge Protector
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats has a fuel consumption of 6.21, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats has a wheelbase of 2705, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats uses Front Drive, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters uses All Wheel Drive.