CarteaCompare CarsX-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats vs ET BEV

X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats vs ET BEV Comparison

Car Information

/

410km

/

77kwh

/

19.8 kWh/100km

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

17

21"

4

/

4680

4980

2065

1975

1730

1694

2705

3000

212

/

Fuel Economy

16.1

19.8 kWh/100km

55

/

Comfort

/

NFC

/

/

Smart Key

/

/

/

/

4-direction electric

Interior

7

/

/

TFT

/

Front Row Seats

/

Fabric

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Front & Back Row Seats

/

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

Driver Seat

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Driver + Passenger + Side + Curtain

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

front seats

Infotainment

/

/

4

23

/

15.6

/

/

/

/

/

/

Battery/Charging

/

10 min/ 20-80%

Transmission

/

/

Xtronic CVT

AT

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

Independent strut

/

Multi Link

/

/

✓ + CDC

Wheels/brakes

Disc

/

Disc

/

Key Spec

2.5 L

TBD

132 BHP - 188 BHP

473HP

Automatic & CVT & Xtronic CVT

AT

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 Seater - 7 Seater

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

كهربائي

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.5 L

/

Gasoline

Electric

DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder

/

181 BHP

473HP

181 @ 6,000

/

244

660Nm

244 @ 4,000

/

/

353kw

Technologies

/

/

/

AUTO-ECO-SPORT

Manual

/

/

/

L2 ADAS

/

Front & Rear

/

/

/

Motor

/

2

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats

    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Remote key types
    • Number of Airbags
    • ABS
    • EBA/BA
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
  • ET BEV

    • Power Tailgate
    • Keyless Entry
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Driving Recorder
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Crash Auto Door Unlock
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Child Lock
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
  • Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
  • High safety equipment increases confidence while driving

Negative

  • Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
  • Fuel consumption is high in the city
  • The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickX-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats if you care more about price; choose ET BEV if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats

VS

Exeed | Exeed TXL 2023 1.6T-GDI Comfort

Nissan | X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats

VS

Exeed | Exeed LX 2024 1.6T-GDI Flagship

Nissan | X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats

VS

Exeed | Exeed LX 2023 1.6T-GDI Flagship

Nissan | X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats

VS

Exeed | Exeed TXL 2024 1.6T-GDI Comfort

Nissan | X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats

VS

Haval | H6 2.0T Supreme (4WD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats has a fuel consumption of 6.21, while ET BEV has a fuel consumption of 5.05. Therefore, ET BEV is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats has a wheelbase of 2705, while ET BEV has a wheelbase of 3000. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ET BEV, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats uses Front Drive, while ET BEV uses Four-Wheel Drive.