CarteaCompare CarsX-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats vs Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD)

X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats vs Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD) Comparison

Car Information

/

7.8

Engine / Motor

/

6

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

17

/

4

/

4680

5035

2065

1989

1730

1778

2705

3008

212

/

Fuel Economy

16.1

9.2

55

/

Comfort

/

/

/

Smart Key

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

7

/

/

/

TFT

/

Front Row Seats

/

Fabric

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Driver + Passenger + Side + Curtain

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

4

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

/

Xtronic CVT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Drive

All Wheel Drive

Independent strut

/

Multi Link

/

Wheels/brakes

Disc

/

Disc

/

/

/

Key Spec

2.5 L

2.0 L - 3.0 L

132 BHP - 188 BHP

252 - 337

Automatic & CVT & Xtronic CVT

8-speed Automatic (8AT) & 8AT & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater - 7 Seater

5 Seater - 7

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.5 L

3.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder

/

181 BHP

337 BHP

181 @ 6,000

/

244

445

244 @ 4,000

/

Technologies

/

/

/

AUTO-ECO-SPORT

/

Manual

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats

    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Remote key types
    • Number of Airbags
    • ABS
    • EBA/BA
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
  • Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD)

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Runflat Tyres
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
  • Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
  • High safety equipment increases confidence while driving

Negative

  • Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
  • Fuel consumption is high in the city
  • The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickX-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats if you care more about price; choose Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD) if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats

VS

Exeed | Exeed TXL 2023 1.6T-GDI Comfort

Nissan | X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats

VS

Exeed | Exeed LX 2024 1.6T-GDI Flagship

Nissan | X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats

VS

Exeed | Exeed LX 2023 1.6T-GDI Flagship

Nissan | X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats

VS

Exeed | Exeed TXL 2024 1.6T-GDI Comfort

Nissan | X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats

VS

Haval | H6 2.0T Supreme (4WD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats has a fuel consumption of 6.21, while Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 10.87. Therefore, X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats has a wheelbase of 2705, while Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD) has a wheelbase of 3008. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats uses Front Drive, while Hongqi HS7 2024 3.0T Comfortable (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.