X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats vs Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
/
/
✓
Engine / Motor
/
N/A
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
17
/
4
/
4680
5.075
2065
1.969
1730
1.716
2705
2.930
212
/
/
/
Fuel Economy
16.1
/
55
74
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
TFT
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Driver + Passenger + Side + Curtain
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
✓
/
Xtronic CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
Independent strut
/
Multi Link
/
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
/
✓
Key Spec
2.5 L
2.5 L - 3.7 L
132 BHP - 188 BHP
226 BHP - 273 BHP
Automatic & CVT & Xtronic CVT
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder
/
181 BHP
226 BHP
181 @ 6,000
/
244
420
244 @ 4,000
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
AUTO-ECO-SPORT
/
Manual
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats if you care more about interior space; choose Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats has a fuel consumption of 6.21, while Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats has a wheelbase of 2705, while Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2.930. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X-TRAIL S 2WD 5 Seats uses Front Drive, while Mazda CX9 2019 2.5L Luxury (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.