X-TRAIL S 4WD 5 Seats vs Atto 3 Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
160 km/h
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
17
215/60R17
4
5 Doors
4680
4455
2065
1875
1730
1615
2705
2720
212
205 mm
/
310
Fuel Economy
15.7
/
55
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
7
5
✓
/
✓
/
TFT
LCD
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
Leather
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
Driver + Passenger + Side + Curtain
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
Android LCD
4
6
/
12.8”Electric Rotary Multimedia Screen
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
/
AC (7KW) DC (80KW)
Transmission
✓
/
✓
/
CVT
AT
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Independent strut
Macpherson
Multi Link
Multi-Link
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
/
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
Key Spec
2.5 L
/
132 BHP - 188 BHP
201 BHP
Automatic & CVT & Xtronic CVT
AT & DHT
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater - 7 Seater
5 - 5
/
TBD
/
420 km
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder
/
181 BHP
201 BHP
181 @ 6,000
/
244
310 Nm
244 @ 4,000
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
AUTO-ECO-SPORT-SNOW-OFF ROAD
✓
Manual
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
9
/
BYD Blade Battery (LFP)
Comparison of configuration highlights
X-TRAIL S 4WD 5 Seats
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
Atto 3 Comfort
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X-TRAIL S 4WD 5 Seats if you care more about price; choose Atto 3 Comfort if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X-TRAIL S 4WD 5 Seats has a fuel consumption of 6.37, while Atto 3 Comfort has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X-TRAIL S 4WD 5 Seats has a wheelbase of 2705, while Atto 3 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2720. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Atto 3 Comfort, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X-TRAIL S 4WD 5 Seats uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Atto 3 Comfort uses Front Drive.