X-TRAIL S 4WD 5 Seats vs Cherokee 3.2L Longitude Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
185 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
17
/
4
5 Doors
4680
4624 mm
2065
1860 mm
1730
1681 mm
2705
2718 mm
212
/
/
841 L
Fuel Economy
15.7
9.9 Km/L
55
60 L
/
9.9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Key
/
/
✓
Interior
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
TFT
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Driver + Passenger + Side + Curtain
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
✓
/
✓
/
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Independent strut
/
Multi Link
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
Key Spec
2.5 L
2.4 L - 3.2 L
132 BHP - 188 BHP
184 BHP - 272 BHP
Automatic & CVT & Xtronic CVT
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
3.2 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder
/
181 BHP
271 BHP
181 @ 6,000
/
244
324 Nm
244 @ 4,000
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
AUTO-ECO-SPORT-SNOW-OFF ROAD
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
X-TRAIL S 4WD 5 Seats
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBA/BA
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
Cherokee 3.2L Longitude
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
- Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
- High safety equipment increases confidence while driving
Negative
- Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
- Fuel consumption is high in the city
- The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X-TRAIL S 4WD 5 Seats if you care more about fuel economy; choose Cherokee 3.2L Longitude if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X-TRAIL S 4WD 5 Seats has a fuel consumption of 6.37, while Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a fuel consumption of 10.1. Therefore, X-TRAIL S 4WD 5 Seats is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X-TRAIL S 4WD 5 Seats has a wheelbase of 2705, while Cherokee 3.2L Longitude has a wheelbase of 2718 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Cherokee 3.2L Longitude, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X-TRAIL S 4WD 5 Seats uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Cherokee 3.2L Longitude uses All Wheel Drive.