X-TRAIL S 4WD 5 Seats vs Jeep Cherokee 2019 3.2L Longitude Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

185

/

6

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

17

/

4

/

4680

4624

2065

1860

1730

1681

2705

2718

212

/

/

841

Fuel Economy

15.7

9.9

55

60

Comfort

/

/

Smart Key

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

7

/

/

/

TFT

/

Front Row Seats

Fabric

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Driver + Passenger + Side + Curtain

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

4

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

/

CVT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

Four-Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Independent strut

/

Multi Link

/

Wheels/brakes

Disc

/

Disc

/

Key Spec

2.5 L

2.4 L - 3.2 L

132 BHP - 188 BHP

184 BHP - 272 BHP

Automatic & CVT & Xtronic CVT

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater - 7 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.5 L

3.2 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

DIG 16-valve 4-cylinder

/

181 BHP

271 BHP

181 @ 6,000

/

244

324

244 @ 4,000

/

Technologies

/

/

/

AUTO-ECO-SPORT-SNOW-OFF ROAD

/

Manual

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • X-TRAIL S 4WD 5 Seats

    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Remote key types
    • Number of Airbags
    • ABS
    • EBA/BA
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
  • Jeep Cherokee 2019 3.2L Longitude

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Rear Defogger
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Excellent off-road driving performance and stable control
  • Spacious interior space suitable for families and luggage
  • High safety equipment increases confidence while driving

Negative

  • Motor performance is less responsive in acceleration
  • Fuel consumption is high in the city
  • The quality of interior materials and technology need to be improved

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickJeep Cherokee 2019 3.2L Longitude

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose X-TRAIL S 4WD 5 Seats if you care more about fuel economy; choose Jeep Cherokee 2019 3.2L Longitude if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | X-TRAIL S 4WD 5 Seats

VS

Nissan | Nissan Xterra 2022 2.5L Titanium (2WD)

Nissan | X-TRAIL S 4WD 5 Seats

VS

Nissan | Nissan Xterra 2021 2.5L Titanium (2WD)

Nissan | X-TRAIL S 4WD 5 Seats

VS

Nissan | Nissan XTerra 2023 2.5L Titanium (2WD)

Nissan | X-TRAIL S 4WD 5 Seats

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Kona 2024 1.6L T-GDI SEL (AWD)

Nissan | X-TRAIL S 4WD 5 Seats

VS

Deepal | G318 Standard

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, X-TRAIL S 4WD 5 Seats has a fuel consumption of 6.37, while Jeep Cherokee 2019 3.2L Longitude has a fuel consumption of 10.1. Therefore, X-TRAIL S 4WD 5 Seats is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, X-TRAIL S 4WD 5 Seats has a wheelbase of 2705, while Jeep Cherokee 2019 3.2L Longitude has a wheelbase of 2718. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Jeep Cherokee 2019 3.2L Longitude, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X-TRAIL S 4WD 5 Seats uses Four-Wheel Drive, while Jeep Cherokee 2019 3.2L Longitude uses All Wheel Drive.