CarteaCompare CarsX2 sDrive20i vs Bronco Badlands 2.7L

X2 sDrive20i vs Bronco Badlands 2.7L Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

180 km/h

180 km/h

/

6

/

2698 cc

/

GCC

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4360 mm

4800 mm

1824 mm

1937 mm

1526 mm

1962 mm

2670 mm

2950 mm

470 L

562 L

/

4 Doors

/

260 m

Fuel Economy

13.5 Km/L

9.2 Km/L

51 L

79 L

13.5 Km/L

9.2 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

12

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

7

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Key Spec

1.5 L - 2.0 L

2.3 L - 3.0 L

138 BHP - 300 BHP

181 - 418 BHP

Automatic

8-speed Automatic & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

4 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

2.7 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

189 BHP

330 BHP

280 Nm

542 Nm

/

V

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • X2 sDrive20i

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • Bronco Badlands 2.7L

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Sporty and dynamic design
  • Powerful and superior performance
  • Advanced internal technologies

Negative

  • Limited storage space
  • High price compared to competitors
  • The comfort of the rear seats is limited

Positive

  • Attractive and iconic design
  • Excellent off-road capabilities
  • Multiple engine options

Negative

  • High price for top categories
  • Limited internal storage space
  • Significant fuel consumption

Related comparisons

Editor's PickX2 sDrive20i

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose X2 sDrive20i if you care more about price; choose Bronco Badlands 2.7L if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

BMW | X2 sDrive20i

VS

Exeed | RX Comfort 2.0T

BMW | X2 sDrive20i

VS

Exeed | VX Executive 2.0T

BMW | X2 sDrive20i

VS

Exeed | Exeed VX 2023 2.0T-GDI Black Gold

BMW | X2 sDrive20i

VS

Exeed | Exeed RX 2024 2.0T Comfort (FWD)

BMW | X2 sDrive20i

VS

Exeed | Exeed VX 2024 2.0T-GDI Black Gold

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, X2 sDrive20i has a fuel consumption of 7.41, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L has a fuel consumption of 10.87. Therefore, X2 sDrive20i is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, X2 sDrive20i has a wheelbase of 2670 mm, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L has a wheelbase of 2950 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Bronco Badlands 2.7L, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X2 sDrive20i uses Front Wheel Drive, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L uses Four Wheel Drive.