X3 M40i xDrive vs Acadia 3.6L SLT1 (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
210 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4716 mm
4917 mm
1897 mm
1915 mm
1676 mm
1676 mm
2864 mm
2858 mm
550 L
362 L
Fuel Economy
11.9 Km/L
11.4 Km/L
65 L
72 L
11.9 Km/L
11.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.0 L
3.6 L
184 BHP - 306 BHP
288 BHP - 310 BHP
Automatic & CVT
Automatic
Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Engine
3.0 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
360 BHP
310 BHP
500 Nm
366 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
X3 M40i xDrive
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Acadia 3.6L SLT1 (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAcadia 3.6L SLT1 (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X3 M40i xDrive if you care more about fuel economy; choose Acadia 3.6L SLT1 (FWD) if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X3 M40i xDrive has a fuel consumption of 8.4, while Acadia 3.6L SLT1 (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.77. Therefore, X3 M40i xDrive is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X3 M40i xDrive has a wheelbase of 2864 mm, while Acadia 3.6L SLT1 (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2858 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X3 M40i xDrive, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X3 M40i xDrive uses All Wheel Drive, while Acadia 3.6L SLT1 (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive.