X3 M40i xDrive vs Bronco Badlands 2.7L Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
180 km/h
/
6
/
2698 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4716 mm
4800 mm
1897 mm
1937 mm
1676 mm
1962 mm
2864 mm
2950 mm
550 L
562 L
/
4 Doors
/
260 m
Fuel Economy
11.9 Km/L
9.2 Km/L
65 L
79 L
11.9 Km/L
9.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
7
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.0 L
2.3 L - 3.0 L
184 BHP - 360 BHP
181 - 418 BHP
Automatic & CVT
8-speed Automatic & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
4 - 5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.0 L
2.7 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
360 BHP
330 BHP
500 Nm
542 Nm
/
V
/
4
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
X3 M40i xDrive
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Bronco Badlands 2.7L
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful motor performance and excellent response
- A luxurious cabin equipped with modern technologies
- Comfortable and dynamic driving system
Negative
- High maintenance and spare parts costs
- The rear luggage space is not the best in the class
- Fuel efficiency can be better
Positive
- Attractive and iconic design
- Excellent off-road capabilities
- Multiple engine options
Negative
- High price for top categories
- Limited internal storage space
- Significant fuel consumption
Related comparisons
Editor's PickBronco Badlands 2.7L
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X3 M40i xDrive if you care more about fuel economy; choose Bronco Badlands 2.7L if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X3 M40i xDrive has a fuel consumption of 8.4, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L has a fuel consumption of 10.87. Therefore, X3 M40i xDrive is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X3 M40i xDrive has a wheelbase of 2864 mm, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L has a wheelbase of 2950 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Bronco Badlands 2.7L, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X3 M40i xDrive uses All Wheel Drive, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L uses Four Wheel Drive.