X3 M40i xDrive vs Yukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4716 mm
5334 mm
1897 mm
2057 mm
1676 mm
1943 mm
2864 mm
3071 mm
550 L
/
Fuel Economy
11.9 Km/L
/
65 L
/
11.9 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.0 L
5.3 L - 6.2 L
184 BHP - 306 BHP
320 BHP - 420 BHP
Automatic & CVT
Automatic
Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7 Seater - 9 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
3.0 L
5.3 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
360 BHP
355 BHP
500 Nm
520 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
X3 M40i xDrive
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Yukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing capabilities
- Advanced entertainment systems
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Their price is relatively high
- Its large size may be inappropriate for some areas
Related comparisons
Editor's PickYukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X3 M40i xDrive if you care more about overall equipment; choose Yukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD) if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X3 M40i xDrive has a fuel consumption of 8.4, while Yukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X3 M40i xDrive has a wheelbase of 2864 mm, while Yukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD) has a wheelbase of 3071 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Yukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X3 M40i xDrive uses All Wheel Drive, while Yukon 5.3 V8 SLE (2WD) uses Front Wheel Drive.