X35 Fashion Plus MT vs Groove 1.5L RS Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
170 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1340
/
16
17
4286
4500 mm
1815
/
1665
/
2560
/
1765
/
390
/
180
/
Fuel Economy
46
45
/
16.1 Km/L
/
16.1 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Driver
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Driver And Passenger Airbag
6
T125/80 R15
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front
/
/
✓
/
2
/
Forward Collision Alert1
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
4
6
Transmission
6MT
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPhersan
/
H torsion beam type
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Solid Disc
/
205/60 R16
/
205/60 R16
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
114 BHP - 150
110 BHP - 110 BHP
& 6MT & Automatic & CVT & CVT & MT
CVT & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5
1.5 T
Gasoline
Gasoline
150
145hp
210
255Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
X35 Fashion Plus MT
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Spare Wheel
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Seat belt reminder
Groove 1.5L RS
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- Lane Following Assist
- Pedestrian airbag
- Collision Detection
- ABS
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel efficiency
- Good and convenient internal space distribution
Negative
- The engine performance is mediocre, especially when accelerating
- The quality of interior details needs improvement
- Insufficient sound insulation on highways
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGroove 1.5L RS
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X35 Fashion Plus MT if you care more about power; choose Groove 1.5L RS if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X35 Fashion Plus MT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Groove 1.5L RS has a fuel consumption of 6.21. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X35 Fashion Plus MT has a wheelbase of 2560, while Groove 1.5L RS has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X35 Fashion Plus MT uses Front Drive, while Groove 1.5L RS uses Front Wheel Drive.