X35 Fashion Plus MT vs EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters Comparison

Car Information

/

6.5

/

160+160

/

≥400

Engine / Motor

/

N/A, Electric

Dimensions

5

7 Seater

1340

/

16

/

4286

5209

1815

2010

1665

1731

2560

3110

1765

/

390

/

180

/

Fuel Economy

46

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

Driver

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

Driver And Passenger Airbag

/

T125/80 R15

/

/

/

/

/

Front

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

4

/

/

Transmission

6MT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

All Wheel Drive

MacPhersan

/

H torsion beam type

/

Wheels/brakes

/

Solid Disc

/

205/60 R16

/

205/60 R16

/

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 1.5 L

/

114 BHP - 150

429 BHP - 543 BHP

& 6MT & Automatic & CVT & CVT & MT

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

5 - 5

4 Seater - 7 Seater

/

TBD

/

320 km - 515 km

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5

0.0 L

Gasoline

Electric

150

429 BHP

210

600

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • X35 Fashion Plus MT

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Rear Camera
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Spare Wheel
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Seat belt reminder
  • EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickX35 Fashion Plus MT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose X35 Fashion Plus MT if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

BAIC | X35 Fashion Plus MT

VS

Haval | Haval Jolion Basic

BAIC | X35 Fashion Plus MT

VS

GAC | GS3 1.3T GB

BAIC | X35 Fashion Plus MT

VS

Nissan | Nissan Kicks 2021 1.6 SV

BAIC | X35 Fashion Plus MT

VS

Opel | Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Enjoy

BAIC | X35 Fashion Plus MT

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 2008 2019 1.6L Active

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, X35 Fashion Plus MT has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, X35 Fashion Plus MT has a wheelbase of 2560, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X35 Fashion Plus MT uses Front Drive, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters uses All Wheel Drive.