CarteaCompare CarsX35 Fashion CVT vs Bronco Badlands 2.7L

X35 Fashion CVT vs Bronco Badlands 2.7L Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

1499

2698 cc

/

180 km/h

/

6

/

GCC

Dimensions

5

5 Seater

1255

/

4325

4800 mm

1830

1937 mm

1640

1962 mm

2570

2950 mm

390

562 L

180

260 m

/

4 Doors

Fuel Economy

46

79 L

/

9.2 Km/L

/

9.2 Km/L

Comfort

Foldable Remote Key

Smart Entry

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

/

Safety

4

/

Non full size T125/80R15

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

12

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

7

Transmission

/

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

Four Wheel Drive

MacPhersan type

/

H torsion beam type

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Ventilated Disk

/

Solid disc

/

205/60 R16

/

215/50 R17

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 1.5 L

2.3 L - 3.0 L

114 BHP - 150

181 - 418 BHP

& 6MT & Automatic & CVT & CVT & MT

8-speed Automatic & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 5

4 - 5

Engine

1.5T

2.7 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

A151R2

/

116

330 BHP

148

542 Nm

/

V

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • X35 Fashion CVT

    • Remote key types
    • Number of Airbags
    • Spare Wheel
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
  • Bronco Badlands 2.7L

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Attractive and iconic design
  • Excellent off-road capabilities
  • Multiple engine options

Negative

  • High price for top categories
  • Limited internal storage space
  • Significant fuel consumption

Related comparisons

Editor's PickX35 Fashion CVT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose X35 Fashion CVT if you care more about price; choose Bronco Badlands 2.7L if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

BAIC | X35 Fashion CVT

VS

Geely | Geely GS Sport 2020 1.8L Classic

BAIC | X35 Fashion CVT

VS

Geely | Geely GS Sport 2021 1.8L Classic

BAIC | X35 Fashion CVT

VS

Geely | Geely GS Sport 2018 1.8L Standard (Full Option)

BAIC | X35 Fashion CVT

VS

Renault | Renault Captur 2018 1.2L SE

BAIC | X35 Fashion CVT

VS

Suzuki | Suzuki Vitara 2020 1.6L GLX 2WD

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, X35 Fashion CVT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L has a fuel consumption of 10.87. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, X35 Fashion CVT has a wheelbase of 2570, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L has a wheelbase of 2950 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Bronco Badlands 2.7L, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X35 Fashion CVT uses Front Drive, while Bronco Badlands 2.7L uses Four Wheel Drive.