X35 Fashion CVT vs CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
1499
1790 cc
/
180 km/h
/
4
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1255
/
4325
4390 mm
1830
1795 mm
1640
1565 mm
2570
2640 mm
390
/
180
/
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
46
43 L
/
16 Km/L
/
16 Km/L
Comfort
Foldable Remote Key
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
4
/
Non full size T125/80R15
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
7
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
/
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPhersan type
/
H torsion beam type
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Ventilated Disk
/
Solid disc
/
205/60 R16
/
215/50 R17
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
1.8 L
114 BHP - 150
96 BHP - 121 BHP
& 6MT & Automatic & CVT & CVT & MT
CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 Seater
Engine
1.5T
1.8 L
Gasoline
Hybrid
A151R2
/
116
96 BHP
148
142 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
X35 Fashion CVT
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- Spare Wheel
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP)
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X35 Fashion CVT if you care more about price; choose CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP) if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X35 Fashion CVT has a fuel consumption of No data, while CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP) has a fuel consumption of 6.25. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X35 Fashion CVT has a wheelbase of 2570, while CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP) has a wheelbase of 2640 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X35 Fashion CVT uses Front Drive, while CHR GX 1.8L (96 HP) uses Front Wheel Drive.