X35 Fashion CVT vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
1499
/
/
161 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1255
/
4325
4341 mm
1830
1804 mm
1640
1693 mm
2570
2676 mm
390
414 L
180
/
Fuel Economy
46
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
Foldable Remote Key
/
Safety
4
/
Non full size T125/80R15
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
/
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPhersan type
/
H torsion beam type
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Ventilated Disk
/
Solid disc
/
205/60 R16
/
215/50 R17
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
114 BHP - 150
105 BHP - 135 BHP
6MT & Automatic & CVT
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Engine
1.5T
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
A151R2
/
116
115 BHP
148
156 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
X35 Fashion CVT
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- Spare Wheel
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X35 Fashion CVT if you care more about power; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about interior space.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X35 Fashion CVT has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X35 Fashion CVT has a wheelbase of 2570, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X35 Fashion CVT uses Front Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.