X35 Fashion CVT vs GS4 1.5T GB Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
1499
/
/
180 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1255
/
4325
4545 mm
1830
1856 mm
1640
1668 mm
2570
2680 mm
390
470 L
180
/
Fuel Economy
46
55 L
/
14.7 Km/L
/
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
Foldable Remote Key
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
4
/
Non full size T125/80R15
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
/
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPhersan type
/
H torsion beam type
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Ventilated Disk
/
Solid disc
/
205/60 R16
/
215/50 R17
/
Key Spec
1.5 L - 1.5 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
114 BHP - 150
165 BHP - 248
& 6MT & Automatic & CVT & CVT & MT
8AT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 - 5
5 - 5
Engine
1.5T
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
A151R2
/
116
165 BHP
148
265 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
X35 Fashion CVT
- Remote key types
- Number of Airbags
- Spare Wheel
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
GS4 1.5T GB
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickX35 Fashion CVT
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X35 Fashion CVT if you care more about price; choose GS4 1.5T GB if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X35 Fashion CVT has a fuel consumption of No data, while GS4 1.5T GB has a fuel consumption of 6.8. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X35 Fashion CVT has a wheelbase of 2570, while GS4 1.5T GB has a wheelbase of 2680 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GS4 1.5T GB, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X35 Fashion CVT uses Front Drive, while GS4 1.5T GB uses Front Wheel Drive.