X4 xDrive M40i vs Tiggo 9 Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7
4733 mm
4810
1938 mm
1925
1621 mm
1742
2864 mm
2800
500 L
/
/
19
Fuel Economy
11 Km/L
13
67 L
/
11 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
/
Driver Seat
/
10.25
/
✓
/
10.25"
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
/
6
/
✓
Infotainment
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
Battery/Charging
/
4
Transmission
/
AT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.0 L
-
245 BHP - 354 BHP
254 - 254
Automatic
AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.0 L
2.0L
Gasoline
Gasoline
354 BHP
254
500 Nm
390
/
Turbocharge
/
2.0T GDI
Technologies
✓
/
/
19 ADAS Functions
/
✓
/
✓
/
Eco + Normal + Sport
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
X4 xDrive M40i
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Tiggo 9 Comfort
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- Sporty and attractive design
- Powerful engine performance
- Advanced in cabin technology
Negative
- Limited space for rear seats
- High operating cost
- The control system may be complicated for some users
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo 9 Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X4 xDrive M40i if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo 9 Comfort if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X4 xDrive M40i has a fuel consumption of 9.09, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, Tiggo 9 Comfort is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X4 xDrive M40i has a wheelbase of 2864 mm, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X4 xDrive M40i, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X4 xDrive M40i uses All Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 9 Comfort uses Front Drive.