X4 xDrive M40i vs Okavango GK 2.0T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

250 km/h

180 km/h

/

4

/

1998 cc

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5 Seater

7 Seater

4733 mm

4860 mm

1938 mm

1910 mm

1621 mm

1770 mm

2864 mm

2825 mm

500 L

257 L

/

5 Doors

/

194 mm

Fuel Economy

11 Km/L

10 Km/L

67 L

52 L

11 Km/L

10 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Entry

/

Interior

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

12.3

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

Transmission

/

7DCT

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 3.0 L

2.0 L - 2.0 L

184 BHP - 354 BHP

218 - 218

Automatic

7DCT & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

7 - 7

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.0 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

354 BHP

218 BHP

500 Nm

325 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Single Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • X4 xDrive M40i

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • Okavango GK 2.0T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickOkavango GK 2.0T

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose X4 xDrive M40i if you care more about fuel economy; choose Okavango GK 2.0T if you care more about power.

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, X4 xDrive M40i has a fuel consumption of 9.09, while Okavango GK 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, X4 xDrive M40i is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, X4 xDrive M40i has a wheelbase of 2864 mm, while Okavango GK 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2825 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X4 xDrive M40i, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X4 xDrive M40i uses All Wheel Drive, while Okavango GK 2.0T uses Front Wheel Drive.