X4 xDrive M40i vs Tiggo7 Pro Max COM Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4733 mm
4500
1938 mm
1842
1621 mm
1746
2864 mm
2670
500 L
/
/
Flush Door
/
18
/
5
Fuel Economy
11 Km/L
16.6
67 L
/
11 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
Interior
✓
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
12.3
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
/
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.0 L
/
184 BHP - 354 BHP
/
Automatic
/
Gasoline & Petrol
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
/
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
354 BHP
197 BHP
500 Nm
290
/
1.6L TDGI
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
X4 xDrive M40i
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Tiggo7 Pro Max COM
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Steering Adjustment
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo7 Pro Max COM
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X4 xDrive M40i if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo7 Pro Max COM if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X4 xDrive M40i has a fuel consumption of 9.09, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a fuel consumption of 6.02. Therefore, Tiggo7 Pro Max COM is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X4 xDrive M40i has a wheelbase of 2864 mm, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a wheelbase of 2670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X4 xDrive M40i, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X4 xDrive M40i uses All Wheel Drive, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM uses Front Drive.