X5 40i xDrive vs Acadia 3.6L SLT1 (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
243 km/h
210 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4922 mm
4917 mm
2004 mm
1915 mm
1745 mm
1676 mm
2975 mm
2858 mm
645 L
362 L
Fuel Economy
11.4 Km/L
11.4 Km/L
83 L
72 L
11.4 Km/L
11.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L - 5.0 L
3.6 L
306 BHP - 530 BHP
288 BHP - 310 BHP
Automatic & CVT
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
7 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.0 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
340 BHP
310 BHP
450 Nm
366 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
X5 40i xDrive
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Acadia 3.6L SLT1 (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- The power of dynamic performance
- Luxurious interior design and advanced equipment
- Convenient and thoughtful space distribution
Negative
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Complexity in the operation of electronic systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickAcadia 3.6L SLT1 (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X5 40i xDrive if you care more about interior space; choose Acadia 3.6L SLT1 (FWD) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X5 40i xDrive has a fuel consumption of 8.77, while Acadia 3.6L SLT1 (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 8.77. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X5 40i xDrive has a wheelbase of 2975 mm, while Acadia 3.6L SLT1 (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2858 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X5 40i xDrive, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X5 40i xDrive uses All Wheel Drive, while Acadia 3.6L SLT1 (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive.