X5 40i xDrive vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
243 km/h
161 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4922 mm
4341 mm
2004 mm
1804 mm
1745 mm
1693 mm
2975 mm
2676 mm
645 L
414 L
Fuel Economy
11.4 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
83 L
50 L
11.4 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L - 5.0 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
306 BHP - 530 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
Automatic & CVT
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
3.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
340 BHP
115 BHP
450 Nm
156 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
X5 40i xDrive
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- The power of dynamic performance
- Luxurious interior design and advanced equipment
- Convenient and thoughtful space distribution
Negative
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Complexity in the operation of electronic systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickDuster 1.6L PE (4x2)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X5 40i xDrive if you care more about interior space; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X5 40i xDrive has a fuel consumption of 8.77, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X5 40i xDrive has a wheelbase of 2975 mm, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X5 40i xDrive, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X5 40i xDrive uses All Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.