X5 M50i xDrive vs Land Cruiser 3.5T GR-Sport Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
210 km/h
/
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4922 mm
4995 mm
2004 mm
1990 mm
1745 mm
1925 mm
2975 mm
2850 mm
645 L
1004 L
/
5 Doors
/
221 m
Fuel Economy
9.5 Km/L
9.3 Km/L
83 L
110 L
9.5 Km/L
9.3 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
12
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Key Spec
3.0 L - 5.0 L
3.3 L - 5.7 L
306 BHP - 530 BHP
240 BHP - 409
Automatic & CVT
10-Speed AT with Sequential Mode & Automatic & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
7 - 8 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
4.4 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
530 BHP
409 BHP
750 Nm
650 Nm
/
V
/
Twin Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
X5 M50i xDrive
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Land Cruiser 3.5T GR-Sport
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear Power Outlet
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Sensor Rear Tailgate
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- The power of dynamic performance
- Luxurious interior design and advanced equipment
- Convenient and thoughtful space distribution
Negative
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Fuel economy is lower than expected
- Complexity in the operation of electronic systems
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X5 M50i xDrive if you care more about fuel economy; choose Land Cruiser 3.5T GR-Sport if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X5 M50i xDrive has a fuel consumption of 10.53, while Land Cruiser 3.5T GR-Sport has a fuel consumption of 10.75. Therefore, X5 M50i xDrive is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X5 M50i xDrive has a wheelbase of 2975 mm, while Land Cruiser 3.5T GR-Sport has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X5 M50i xDrive, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X5 M50i xDrive uses All Wheel Drive, while Land Cruiser 3.5T GR-Sport uses Four Wheel Drive.