X6 xDrive40i vs Tiggo 4 Pro COM Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
4935 mm
4318
2212 mm
1831
1696 mm
1662
2975 mm
2610
580 L
/
/
Flush Door
/
17
/
5
Fuel Economy
10.1 Km/L
/
83 L
/
10.1 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
Interior
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Dual Front Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
Transmission
/
CVT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
215/60 R17
/
215/60 R17
Key Spec
3.0 L - 4.4 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
306 BHP - 530 BHP
111 BHP - 156
Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
340 BHP
111 BHP
450 Nm
/
/
1.5L
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO, Normal
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
X6 xDrive40i
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Tiggo 4 Pro COM
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo 4 Pro COM
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose X6 xDrive40i if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo 4 Pro COM if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, X6 xDrive40i has a fuel consumption of 9.9, while Tiggo 4 Pro COM has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, X6 xDrive40i has a wheelbase of 2975 mm, while Tiggo 4 Pro COM has a wheelbase of 2610. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, X6 xDrive40i, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. X6 xDrive40i uses All Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 4 Pro COM uses Front Drive.